2018年闲杂时间写了一点关于建筑与哲学 (逻辑与语言) 的随笔。在随后的学习过程中，我发现我对建筑认知在不断改变，因此想以大二的随笔初稿做为起点，做一个思考记录与修正。写这篇随笔的初衷是大二历史课上同学关于form和function展开了激烈的争论。随后发现，建筑形式和20世纪末期文化认知的改变密不可分。随笔初稿主要分析比较了Peter Eisenman, Bernard Tschumi, Michel Foucault, 和Ludwig Wittgenstein四人的作品及思想，随后的修正中加入分析了Martin Heidegger和Vincent van Gogh (19/12/27)。
Peter Eisenman and Michel Foucault
“Caused by the absence of the king - an absence that is an artifice... is an essential void: the necessary disappearance of that which is its foundation... and representation, freed finally from the relation that was impeding it, can offer itself as representation in its pure form .”[1]
The invisible king resembles the initial vector in the framework of an autonomous system. The absence of the initial vector resulted in an incomplete logical closure.
[1]Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: an Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Routledge, 2010.
在2018年初稿中，我认为不存在的初始参数使逻辑无法自洽，而文字赋予structure的initial vector并不满足autonomy的前提。也就是说，我之前认为这种autonomy是二次表达knowledge (text included) as input - form as output，而它其实是三次表达 knowledge as input - text as definition - form as output。二次表达是古典时期知识生产模式典型，三次表达是马克思商品生产模式雏形。最常见的二次表达是基础素描，用画面对现实进行模仿。建筑学中最常见的三次表达是representation，用画面对现实进行转述 (eg. precedent analysis)。
如果认为autonomous architecture的三次表达的产物，或三次表达是autonomous architecture的手段，那么text就必须要从第一阶段knowledge as input中剥离出来。
tbc